Unspeakable Conversations
Unspeakable Conversations
Harriet McBryde Johnson is an attorney and activist from North Carolina. She engaged in debate with the famed Peter Singer, author of Animal Liberation, who has garnered notoriety from two arguments:
- Animal consumption is morally impermissible.
- Abortion and infanticide of disabled children is morally permissible.
Both arguments are about the nature of suffering and use utilitarian and consequentialist evaluations. Singer’s arguments gain special attention because of the apparent contradiction between the value of animals and the value of disabled people in his paradigm.
Singer and Johnson are both atheists who use secular philosophy to rationalize their arguments; yet they arrive at different conclusions. Johnson’s story describes not only the rational contradictions that arose in the debate but also the relational contradictions that surface when a disabled person and a secular, maximalist utilitarian engage in “polite” dialogue. The diorama renders those contradictions — and the strange “collaboration” that occurred between political enemies.








